Tag Archives: Uk Law

Human Rights Law & Personal Injury Claims

Recent years have seen several far reaching reforms enacted to the UK justice system.

Such reforms have encompassed legal aid funding, legal reform, and an emphasis on arbitration and mediation in courts and tribunals, which will further impact upon the provision of justice. 2014 also saw the implementing of new contracts for police station solicitors; the tender process, and the actual contracts, were widely condemned and criticised by many in the legal sector.

The overall impact of such reforms has been to essentially deny justice to many thousands of average, households in the UK, a fact which the legal sector has raised in no uncertain terms. Most of the legal reforms are ultimately (but not entirely) a simple cost cutting measure, amidst reduced public funding and a slow, painful economic recovery. However, to an extent, the legal reforms, and the ensuing limited access to justice, are, ironically, potentially illegal.

Human Rights law, both domestic and EU, requires and allows for a full and impartial trial, with adequate and proper legal representation throughout any legal proceedings. Articles 5 and 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) addresses this, as does the Human Rights Act (1998). The recent legal reforms mentioned, however, seriously challenge that fundamental legal and human right.

A good example here is employment law. This is an increasingly touchy and emotive area of law as job security and zero hours contracts are a major current legal issue. Aside from that, employers have a responsibility for the health and safety of their staff, visitors and contractors in the workplace. If health and safety rules and regulations are breached, there can be accidents and injuries at work. Such accidents can range from a few cuts and blisters, to sprained ankles, to broken limbs, to long term chronic medical conditions developing. The result of an injury at work can be to cost the business greatly in productivity and lost working hours, as well as on-going support for injured employees; HSE figures for 2012/13 show that the estimated cost of workplace injuries and health issues arising was just over £14 billion. Of course, economics aside, that is nothing compared to the human cost for those actually injured.

The law enshrines the right of the injured party to make such an injury at work claim, under tort and civil law. Amidst such legal reforms, it would be very hard for the average employee to take their legal claim to court. Although the (2014) average wage nationally in the UK was £26,500, inflation, debts and the rising cost of living severely reduces the amount of money an average employee would have fund a legal case. Further, the great majority of unskilled workers (often in industries prone to severe workplace injuries) actually earn more in the £10,000 – £13,000 bracket (2014 figures), or less. Amidst the legal reforms, bringing a simple workplace injury claim to court is therefore far beyond the means of the average employee.

In the personal injury sector, however, many cases continue to be funded by Conditional Fee Agreements (CFA). With a CFA, litigants only pay their lawyers on the understanding that their case will be won, and that compensation will be awarded. Litigants do not pay if their case is unsuccessful. If it were not for the system of CFA funding, many personal injury litigants, be they injured at the workplace or indeed elsewhere, would simply not be able to obtain the justice that they are entitled to under law.

Employment law, and personal injury law aside, there are many areas of law (such as family) where it is simply too costly in time, effort, procedure and money, for people to obtain justice- contrary to human rights law.

The legal sector has tried to protest this, and to raise this very serious concern. The government is more concerned with the Budget and economic recovery, as opposed to such legal niceties. The fact remains that the reforms are potentially illegal, as they deny justice to many, in breach of human rights law.

One government response has been to put in the 2015 Queen’s Speech plans to reform and replace current human rights legislation with a new Bill of Rights or similar. In that fashion, with new human rights principles, the government can no longer be said to be acting in breach of current human rights provisions that enshrine the right of all to seek a legal remedy in court.

New Stalking Law in the UK

Although it has been illegal to stalk a person in Scotland for some time, it has taken until now for a similar law to be introduced in England and Wales. Stalking is a crime that is commonplace, but only a fraction of offenders are brought to trial. Up until now a stalker could only be charged with harassment, a lesser offence, but the new law will place more emphasis on the seriousness of the crime. Of an estimated 120,000 victims, only 53,000 are recorded as crimes each year, and fewer than 50 offenders are jailed.

Tougher Legislation

Since the change in the law in Scotland, which took place in 2010, heavier sentences have been levied and more people have been arrested. In the ten years before the change in the law only 70 offenders were prosecuted; since 2010 almost 450 cases have been brought. Ann Moulds, who founded Action Scotland Against Stalking and was instrumental in getting the law changed, did so after she was stalked by a man who acted as a friend. She confided in him about her stalker, but all the time it was actually him. She is now taking her campaign to the European Parliament.

Stalking in Cyberspace

Stalking is a growing problem online, with social networking sites offering a perfect platform for stalkers to operate from. With anonymity seemingly guaranteed offenders are free to browse and follow who they want. However, there are more stringent online protection laws in place, and they are being seen to have an effect. Stalking remains a serious problem, and one that is growing in stature, but it is to be hoped that the new laws will deter people from harassing both men and women in a manner that can be stressful, frightening and detrimental to the health of the victim.

Schofield in ITV Paedophile List Row

Popular TV presenter Philip Schofield is at the centre of a row following an appearance by Prime Minister David Cameron on the ITV breakfast show ‘This Morning’.  During the interview Schofield handed Mr Cameron a piece of paper upon which were written the names of four alleged paedophiles, believed to be linked with the Conservative party, that he had found by searching the internet. Broadcast regulator Ofcom has confirmed that complaints have been made.

Outrageous Stunt

The incident has been branded an ‘outrageous stunt’ by senior politicians, and Schofield has been forced to apologise. Ofcom has been urged, by Tory MP Rob Wilson, to investigate whether ITV has breached its duty to allow individuals a chance to respond before serious allegations were made about them. However, it should be noted that the names were not mentioned, and that it would be extremely difficult for those watching to read the list.

Cameron Also Criticised

The interview also led to criticism of Mr Cameron who appeared to directly link paedophilia with homosexuality. The Prime Minister warned that open discussion about alleged paedophile rings could lead to a ‘witch hunt’ against people who are gay. In addition, this has led many people to assume that the names on the list included gay politicians.

Tatchell Responds

Human rights campaigner Peter Tatchell was quick to comment:

“There is no reason why he should link the current scandals with gay people or warn of an anti-gay witch-hunt. The current investigations concern paedophilia, not homosexuality.”

Schofield’s actions have been widely criticised in both broadcasting and political circles, especially with regard to the accuracy of the information he claimed to be presenting. Internet rumours are nothing but, and it is essential that broadcasters verify any claims in order to minimise the risk of legal action by anyone who is named in such a fashion.